Fibre Channel (SAN)

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 6
Registered: ‎09-30-2010

ISL or not? A place with only 2 SANswitches


I happen to visit several data centers with two different scenarios:

  • 2 Sans witches
  • 1 storage with dual controllers and dual FC connections each one.
  • several servers with dual FC connections.

I've seen that some of them have an ISL and some not. One fabric with two ISL´d switches or two separated fabrics.

If they ask me I'd prefer to have them separated. In that way we have a real redundant configuration even though I have to work twice when making any kind of change. But, for example, updating firmware would be an ease task to do since the other fabric would n´t be affected by the process.

On the other hand, if anything happens to the fabric zoning database having two fabrics it would make a complete mess.

My question is... Is it better to merge those 2 fabrics or not? Perhaps any of you guys cant tell which way is the best or why.


Frequent Contributor
Posts: 141
Registered: ‎05-26-2009

Re: ISL or not? A place with only 2 SANswitches

Keep two fabrics. Either do Zoning via BNA or just have a cron job on your management pc gathering a configupload each night.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 761
Registered: ‎06-11-2010

Re: ISL or not? A place with only 2 SANswitches


I completely agree with . As The Offspring song says: Keep'em separated.

It is recommendable to have two isolated fabrics.


Join the Community

Get quick and easy access to valuable resource designed to help you manage your Brocade Network.

vADC is now Pulse Secure
Download FREE NVMe eBook