Application Delivery (ADX)

Reply
New Contributor
Posts: 4
Registered: ‎02-19-2011

ServerIron XL - When healthck runs box stops responding to pings.

Firstly,

I know that the ServerIron XL is ancient and I plan on replacing it asap. =)

I am having an issue where the ServerIron XL increases latency and drops packets whenever the healthcks are running.

Here is my configuration:

healthck node-a tcp
  dest-ip x.x.x.x
  port http
  protocol http
  protocol http url "GET /test/file.gif"
  l7-check

healthck node-a-ssl tcp
  dest-ip x.x.x.x
  port ssl
  protocol ssl
  protocol ssl url "GET /test/file.gif"
  protocol ssl use-complete
  l7-check

server remote-name node-a x.x.x.x
port default disable
use-learned-mac-addr
weight 2 0
port http
port http healthck node-a
port http keepalive
port http url "HEAD /"
port ssl
port ssl healthck node-a-ssl
port ssl keepalive

I have 20 remote servers and 2x healthcks each (for a total of 40)

I noticed that when I ping the ServerIron with the above configuration in place there was consistent latency and some packet loss.

When I add 'interval 30' to the healthck statements I notice that the pings are only timing out about once every 30 seconds or so, which leads me to believe that when the healthcks are running it is causing high cpu or memory utilization (possibly both).

Are healthcks pretty resource intensive?

Is there a better less resource intensive way to handle this?

thanks =)

Super Contributor
Posts: 1,087
Registered: ‎12-13-2009

Re: ServerIron XL - When healthck runs box stops responding to pings.

Hi drew.weaver,

     Long time since I have used an XL

     Yes L7 checks are resource heavy.  And no there is not much you can do othen then use L4-check or drop the SSL check (this is the one that is taking the most recources).

Thanks

Michael.

Join the Community

Get quick and easy access to valuable resource designed to help you manage your Brocade Network.

vADC is now Pulse Secure
Download FREE NVMe eBook