06-04-2012 12:43 PM
Both CTP function without errors if they are the only CTP installed, adding a second CTP causes the error, two replacement cards were tried with the same results 474,414,472
06-04-2012 01:01 PM
I ask in my preview Post for E/OSn Installed Release.
--->>>Both CTP function without errors if they are the only CTP installed, adding a second CTP causes the error,....
Is long time ago i worked with i10K, if you say both CTP work Fine when are inserted single, show to me:
a) both CTP have different Revision, AFAIK this behavior was solved by Microcode Upgrade
b) switching Module is defective
06-04-2012 01:15 PM
Check for any Event Data below, is in the LOGS listed. however Code 474 Indicate a Defective CTP.
Event Code: 474
Byte 1 = invalid configuration
Byte 2 = configuration write failure
Byte 3= communication lost
Byte 4 = invalid CTP state
Byte 5 = CTP takeover pending
Byte 6 = system framework failure
Byte 7 = memory usage threshold exceeded
Byte 8= number of process restarts exceeded
Byte 9 = process fatal error
Byte 10 = critical process failure
Byte 11= system timer expired
Byte 12= invalid software release
06-05-2012 06:21 AM
Do you think a corrupted configuration file can cause the roll over and failure reporting of the CTP cards. All revision levels match hardware and firmware and the unit runs fine with a base configuration file. The swm's all check out good.
06-05-2012 11:34 AM
The EOS is 220.127.116.11
The CTP cards are both rev 215.
When I try to wipe out the configuration with decommission I can get the 2 CTP cards up together. When I either restore the production configuration from EFCM or try and flashcopy from one active card to a newly inserted replacement, it wont work. The newly inserted CTP immediately becomes active without my consent and fails the other board. More specifically, it puts it in a starting status ad infinitum.
Thanks for your help.