09-14-2011 02:21 AM
I please have the following topics/questions:
Is it possible, allowed and supported to run dynamic OSPF routing over NON-CCEP ports on a NI MLX configured with MCT?
The v5100 configuration manual tells me the following on page 824:
"In the current release, MCT switches must have complete routing information using static
routes for L3 forwarding."
I further found two missleading information on MCT failure scenario behaviour in the manual if ICL/CCP fails:
2. Otherwise, the node with higher RBridge ID becomes Slave.
If the client is reachable from both MCT nodes, the higher
RBridge Id becomes the Master.
Well, what is correct now?
And.... about the Master/Slave election on ICL/CCP failure:
The manual tells me that the Master/Slave election is done on a per MCT client basis:
"The Master/Slave negotiation is done per MCT client on the basis of RBridge Id and client
Local or Remote reachability."
Is this correct?
Or is the Master/Slave election (only) done for the whole switch at all?
How should a per client election work when ICL/CCP is broken and MCT only has the keepalive link on which only CRR but no CCP packets are exchanged?!?
Thank you for any kind help.